These pages shows a essay that is whole a typical example of how exactly to structure your content

These pages shows a essay that is whole a typical example of how exactly to structure your content

Example academic essay

Example essay that is academic The Death Penalty. This essay shows many important features which commonly come in essays.

Should the death penalty be restored in the united kingdom?

The restoration of this death penalty for serious crimes is a problem of debate in the united kingdom because of the rise that is recent violent crime. The complexities, effects and answers to the nagging problems of violent crime throw up a number of complex issues that are further complicated in addition that crime is reported. Newspapers often sensationalise crime so that you can increase circulation and also this makes objective discussion more difficult. This essay will examine this topic firstly by thinking about the arguments put forward by those in favour regarding the death penalty after which by looking at the arguments in opposition to the theory.

The key arguments in preference of restoring the death penalty are those of deterrence and retribution: the theory is that individuals will be dissuaded from violent crime that they gave out to others if they know they will face the ultimate punishment and that people should face the same treatment. Statistics show that whenever the death penalty was temporarily withdrawn in Britain between 1965 and 1969 the murder rate increased by 125% (Clark, 2005). However, we have to think about the possibility that other reasons might have result in this rise. Amnesty International (1996) claims it is impractical to prove that capital punishment is a better deterrent than being given a life sentence in prison and therefore “evidence….gives no support to your evidence hypothesis theory.” It seems at the best that the deterrence theory is yet to be proven. The idea of ‘retribution’ is a fascinating one: there was a appeal that is basic the easy phrase ‘the punishment should fit the crime’. Calder (2003) neatly summarises this argument as he says that killers give up their rights when they kill and that then it shows that we undervalue the right to live if punishments are too lenient. There are more points too meant for the death penalty, one of these simple cost that is being. It is obviously far cheaper to execute prisoners promply rather than feed and house them for a long time on end.

The arguments up against the death penalty are mainly ethical within their nature, that it is basically wrong to kill and therefore as soon as the state kills it sends out of the wrong message towards the rest of the country. Webber (2005) claims that the death penalty makes people believe that ‘killing people is morally permissable’. It is an interesting argument – can you teach children never to hit by hitting them? Wouldn’t this instead suggest to them that hitting was indeed ‘permissable’? There is the reality that you could execute innocent people. Innocent people can always be released from prison, nonetheless they can’t ever be cut back from the dead. When individuals have already been killed there is absolutely no potential for rehabilitation or criminals attempting to make up for crimes. For this good reason capital punishment has been called ‘the bluntest of blunt instruments’ (Clark, 2005).

In summary, the arguments put forward by those who support or are resistant to the death penalty often reflect their deeper principles and beliefs. These beliefs and principles are deeply rooted in life experiences additionally the way people are brought up and are usually unlikely to be swayed by clever arguments. It is interesting that in this country most people are in favour of the death penalty yet parliament will continue to oppose it. In this instance maybe it’s argued that parliament is at the forefront in upholding human rights and continues to broadcast the clear message that killing is always wrong.

You ought to be in a position to observe that this essay comprises of:

An introduction in three parts:
1. A sentence saying why the subject is relevant and interesting.
2. A sentence (or two) mentioning the difficulties and issues mixed up in topic.
3. An outline of the essay.

Main paragraphs with:
1. An interest sentence which gives a main idea/argument which tells us what the entire paragraph is all about.
2. Evidence from outside sources which offer the argument(s) put forward within the sentence that is topic.
3. Some input that is personal the author analysing the points put forward within the topic sentence plus the outside sources.

A conclusion:
Summarises essayshark the points that are main gives a remedy to your question.

Schreiben Sie einen Kommentar